<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:38:57 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Caren Johnson Literary Agency blog</title><subtitle>Blog</subtitle><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2010-09-01T12:26:04Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Submissions Update - Again</title><category term="CJLA Info: General Updates"/><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="queries"/><category term="submissions"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/9/1/submissions-update-again.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/9/1/submissions-update-again.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-09-01T11:45:42Z</published><updated>2010-09-01T11:45:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Hey literary world. So my August closure to queries was helpful, but I'm still behind. I haven't quite cleared out what was there from July (working on it). The bigger thing is that I have a lot of work to do for existing clients.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I'm sure you would agree if you were in their shoes that an agent's first responsibility is to her clients, not her query pool. What good would I be if I just kept signing new things instead of selling the things I have, right?</p>
<p>So for another month, that's what I'll be concentrating on. I will reopen eventually, but for the meantime, you'll get a nice auto-response from me if you query me. Mostly they will be deleted unread. The one exception is if I've asked to see your next book before this point, please do email me anyway if you're ready to query.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Fortune Contest Winners!</title><category term="Books to Check Out"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="amy finawitz"/><category term="contest"/><category term="fortunes"/><category term="twitter"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/8/9/the-fortune-contest-winners.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/8/9/the-fortune-contest-winners.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-08-09T11:26:08Z</published><updated>2010-08-09T11:26:08Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for participating in the <a href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/28/the-fortune-cookie-contest.html" target="_blank">LIFE AND OPINIONS OF AMY FINAWITZ contest</a>! We had a great time reading all the entries. There were some tough decisions, since everyone was so gosh darn clever, but eventually <a href="http://twitter.com/editorgurl" target="_blank">Nancy Mercado</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/lauratofflercor" target="_blank">Laura Toffler-Corrie</a> and I narrowed it down.</p>
<p>So without further ado here are the winning tweets...</p>
<p><strong>FIRST PRIZE (signed book and critique):</strong></p>
<p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/LauraRenegar/status/20144748889" target="_blank">@LauraRenegar:&nbsp;Not every dog in the conga line really knows how to dance.</a></li>
</ul>
<br /><strong>Runners-up (an awesome batch of evil fortune cookies!):</strong><br />
<ul>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/Karen2sc/status/19791159712" target="_blank">@Karen2sc:&nbsp;This is not a form letter.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/susanjsteward/status/19995805030" target="_blank">@susansteward:&nbsp;Query letters should be like underpants--brief, fresh, and your own.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/MLBrown_writes/status/20035143555" target="_blank">@MLBrown_writes:&nbsp;You will fall in love with a handsome stranger soon. Unfortunately, he will be a figment of your imagination.</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>If you're one of the winners, please write me an email with your address! Congrats!</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Fortune Cookie Contest!</title><category term="Books to Check Out"/><category term="CJLA Info: General Updates"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="amy finawitz"/><category term="contest"/><category term="fortunes"/><category term="laura toffler-corrie"/><category term="twitter"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/28/the-fortune-cookie-contest.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/28/the-fortune-cookie-contest.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-07-28T14:13:21Z</published><updated>2010-07-28T14:13:21Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/picture/amyf%20jkt_4launch.jpg?pictureId=4248895&amp;asGalleryImage=true&amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1280327877230" alt="" /></span></span>Do you need some summer laughs? Of course you do! Well, good news. Laura Toffler-Corrie's debut middle-grade novel, THE LIFE AND OPINIONS OF AMY FINAWITZ, will be released into the wild next week.<br /><br />It's a hilarious novel, with a brilliant and wacky cast of characters, and I know you'll be that person who guffaws on the subway while reading it. Because I still do.&nbsp;<br /><br />So. We're running a contest: a Fortune Cookie Twitter contest!</p>
<p>"Why fortune cookies?" you ask, innocently. "Well," I say, "fortune cookies play an important part in our heroine Amy's story."</p>
<p>One awesome way you can get a feel for Amy's fortune cookie flair is to <a href="http://www.lauratoffler-corrie.com/storage/Amyexcerpt.pdf" target="_blank">read the sample chapter here</a>.&nbsp;But here are some examples of fortunes Amy finds in the book:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li><em>When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.</em></li>
<li><em>When you make change, come back a dollar.</em></li>
<li><em>7/5ths of all people do not understand fractions.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Your task: Tweet us your fortunes. What kind of fortunes? Well, fortunes specifically for writers! The fortune cookie you&rsquo;d want to open if you were a writer working on a revision, or waiting for a review, or trying to get published, etc. The sky's the limit!</p>
<p>Let's start with the prizes to entice you.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The GRAND PRIZE WINNER of the FORTUNE COOKIE contest&nbsp;will receive:</strong> 
<ul>
<li>A signed copy of&nbsp;<a href="http://lauratoffler-corrie.com/amy-finawitz" target="_blank">THE LIFE AND OPINIONS OF AMY FINAWITZ</a></li>
<li>A critique of 10 pages of your work by Laura's super-editor <a href="http://twitter.com/editorgurl" target="_blank">Nancy Mercado</a>!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Runners-up prizes:</strong>&nbsp;A pack of these <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/wacky-edibles/df55/" target="_blank">hilarious and evil fortune cookies!</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;THE RULES:</p>
<ol>
<li>Follow author Laura Toffler-Corrie on Twitter:&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/lauratofflercor" target="_blank">@LauraTofflerCor</a>. &nbsp;</li>
<li>Enter your fabulous, fortunes on Twitter. (Fortunes posted as comments to this blog post will be enjoyed, but not judged.)</li>
<li>You MUST use this hashtag in your tweet: #amyfortune (If you don't use it, we'll never see it!)</li>
<li>You may enter up to 10 (TEN) fortunes.</li>
<li>As we know, good fortune should SPREAD. Share the love! Spread the word about the contest!&nbsp;</li>
<li>Laura, Nancy, and I will be the sole judges of the contest.</li>
<li>The deadline for this contest is 9AM<span>&nbsp;Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 3rd (release day!)</span>. Winners will be announced Friday, August 6th. There are no exceptions to this! If any fortune tweets are sent after that time, they will NOT be read.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now get thee to Twitter and start predicting!</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Submission Update</title><category term="CJLA Info: General Updates"/><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="queries"/><category term="submissions info"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/23/submission-update.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/23/submission-update.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-07-23T13:01:55Z</published><updated>2010-07-23T13:01:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Hey querying world,</p>
<p>I am taking a summer break from submissions. The pile has grown way up above my ears, and I'd like to be able to catch up on everything, and requested manuscripts, AND client work. So...</p>
<p>From August 1st to September 1st, I am not accepting queries. I'll update this on the submission page as well.</p>
<p>What will happen if you query me during the month of August?</p>
<p>Easy. You'll get a nice auto-response and the query will be moved to the trash. Please feel free to resubmit in September if you still think I'm a good fit for your project.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>June Query Stats</title><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="June"/><category term="queries"/><category term="stats"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/16/june-query-stats.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/16/june-query-stats.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-07-16T12:18:49Z</published><updated>2010-07-16T12:18:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Hi again. Finally broke through the rest of my June queries yesterday. I got a little behind because of a vacation around the holiday, but I'm just about caught up to my 2 weeks response time. I'm sure I'll be behind again by next week.&nbsp;</p>
<p>At least we spoke in May, my volume was down, with only about 261 queries. This month we're back up a bit. But my request rate is lower again. Mostly I have been really busy, and my list is pretty full, so I'm pickier again.</p>
<ul>
<li>Total: 297</li>
<li>Requested: 3</li>
<li>Categories of Requested: &nbsp;All YA - 2 contemporary, &nbsp;1 dystopian/fantasy</li>
<li>Queries with attachments: only 2!</li>
</ul>
<p>A word on that last point: Please don't send attachments unless I ask for it. I'm just not downloading something I'm not interested in.&nbsp;</p>
<p>AUTHOR/ILLUSTRATORS: A few of you have been pasting images in the body of the email. This also slows me down a lot. One email was so heavy loaded with big files, I could barely scroll down. Annoying. I ask for a link to your online portfolio and website. This is easier.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Two other weird syndromes struck my slush pile this month. First, I got a few of those queries from third parties, that is where the person sending the query is NOT the person who wrote the book. So either authors are hiring someone to do this for them (are you kidding? don't do that), or they had some weird manager on board. One of them looked to be some a small-time film agent of sorts. Basically, I auto-reject these. I want to hear from the real person.</p>
<p>The other one was a string of queries that were all three shades to the left of believable. Like with a little more imagination they could have been spam. They all tended to be adult non-fiction of various kinds (self-help...dating advice...health...), none of which I really represent. And they were ALL formatted exactly the same way. I'm willing to think that maybe there was a batch of people who were all following advice from a single source. Either way, it seems to have stopped, so I'm not worried. But I definitely got a whiff of spam.</p>
<p>And otherwise, it was a lot of the usual tropes. I've been noticing a lot of school plays, Egyptian myth, Mayan lore, etc. Tons and tons of teens with varying degrees of psychic abilities. Nothing that was exciting me all that much, but...we'll keep going!</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Reading is Reading is Reading</title><category term="Books to Check Out"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="Reading"/><category term="ebooks"/><category term="ipad"/><category term="writing"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/8/reading-is-reading-is-reading.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/7/8/reading-is-reading-is-reading.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-07-08T17:32:32Z</published><updated>2010-07-08T17:32:32Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div>
<p>I went on vacation this past week, and like I always do, I took a few books with me. Except this time, I was taking the iPad along. Which meant I was not only taking pleasure reading, but submissions. And this time, I decided to do something new: read one novel electronically, and one novel the good old analog way, on paper.</p>
<p>I've&nbsp;<a href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/4/7/how-i-learned-to-hate-myself-and-love-the-ipad.html">blogged about my iPad love</a>&nbsp;before. I still love it. I do. It's perfect for me, and not just because it's so shiny and pretty. But it does exactly what I need it to do. I can load up manuscripts (directly from email! or Google apps! or Dropbox!), email things back off it, look at my picture book dummies, give PowerPoint presentations at conferences, browse the web, read news, watch stupid YouTube videos...you name it.&nbsp;And it's great for travel. I will never take my laptop with me again. &nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 100px;" src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/storage/littlebee.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278610372137" alt="" /></span></span>But I hadn't read a non-manuscript book on it yet. Until last week, that is, when I purchased my first e-book in the iBookstore. I bought&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Little-Bee-Novel-Chris-Cleave/dp/1416589635" target="_blank">Little Bee</a></em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Little-Bee-Novel-Chris-Cleave/dp/1416589635" target="_blank">&nbsp;by Chris Cleave</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 100px;" src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/storage/longgoodbye.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278610381771" alt="" /></span></span>The other book I took with me was&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Long-Goodbye-Raymond-Chandler/dp/0394757688/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1278610001&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">The Long Goodbye</a></em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Long-Goodbye-Raymond-Chandler/dp/0394757688/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1278610001&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">&nbsp;by Raymond Chandler</a>. I love Chandler. I love his noir-speak, and descriptions. I love his writing so much, that I read him with a pencil in hand, so I can catch the great lines.</p>
<p>In doing thusly with two different formats, I realized that reading on a screen and reading on paper are both really great ways to consume content. Each have strengths. The print book didn't need to get turned off when my airplanes were taking off or landing. The iPad isn't quite as awkward to hold open as a paperback can be. All in all, I think I'd happily purchase another book on the iPad, especially if I didn't want to carry a bunch of things around.</p>
<p>The one thing that I was actually more struck by with each device were the different methods of marking up books. On a whim, I decided to highlight a few passages in <em>Little Bee</em> that really struck me. I don't always do this. In fact, a lot of the time, it's only after I finish a book, and think on it for awhile, that I go back to mark up the passages that I really loved.</p>
<p>But on the iPad it was pretty instantaneous. A few taps and swipes, and I got this (click to make it bigger):</p>
<p><span class="thumbnail-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><a href="javascript:showFullImage('/display/ShowImage?imageUrl=%2Fstorage%2FIMG_0008.PNG%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1278610814510',1024,768);"><img src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/storage/thumbnails/3664643-7643488-thumbnail.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278610821408" alt="" /></a></span></span>Now...sure it's all simulated, but how nice does that highlighting look? I never draw lines that straight when I actually use one! And it also collates them for me on a master page, so I don't have to flip to find things. How fancy. <span class="thumbnail-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><a href="javascript:showFullImage('/display/ShowImage?imageUrl=%2Fstorage%2FIMG_0007.PNG%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1278611295594',1024,768);"><img src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/storage/thumbnails/3664643-7643588-thumbnail.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278611297592" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>In a way, I found it more inviting to start marking up my book. I think we all kind of grow up with the idea that books are sacred, like bibles in church, and you can't write on them. School is mostly to blame for yelling at us that books are not our property.</p>
<p>Except books are meant to inspire and provoke ideas, so writing in them should be utterly natural. And I'm not the only <a href="http://upstartcrowliterary.com/blog/?p=1539" target="_blank">one who has blogged about this recently</a>.</p>
<p>But I think I want to end by going back to my choosing to read Raymond Chandler with a pencil. A lot of people looked at me funny when I sat with a pencil on the plane, like I would only mark up pages if I were studying. It's a shame really, because we really should be engaging more with our reading material. That's what it's there for, after all. So be it a pencil or an iPad, I'll take it. &nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span class="thumbnail-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="javascript:showFullImage('/display/ShowImage?imageUrl=%2Fstorage%2FIMG_0779%2014-55-59.jpg%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1278617699997',1200,1600);"><img src="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/storage/thumbnails/3664643-7645370-thumbnail.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278617699998" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Politics of Offers</title><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="etiquette"/><category term="representation"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/24/the-politics-of-offers.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/24/the-politics-of-offers.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-06-24T11:45:15Z</published><updated>2010-06-24T11:45:15Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>So I'm going to do a little Q&A now about offers of representation. Obviously there are going to be a lot of permutations and probabilities of these scenarios so I won't be able to cover everything, but after asking for the main questions on Twitter, here we go:</p>
<p><strong>MY END</strong></p>
<p><em>1. How do I know when I want to offer?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> </em>I know I love a manuscript when want to tell people about it the minute I finish reading it. But I don't always know if I want to offer until I talk to you. Sometimes the manuscript is great, but I have notes. Sometimes I want to make sure you're not crazy. Usually I get to the end of the phone call before saying, "So, I'd love work with you and offer representation."</p>
<p><em>2. Do I pass the manuscript around to the agency first?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em></em>Often enough. We're a small agency, so that's really only one other opinion. But it's nice to have a second thumbs-up, especially if I'm a little on the fence. If I'm 100% in love with it, I might just want Caren to read it so she can be equally excited about it. But we also work on different kinds of projects, so if I want to sign a picture book, or Caren is signing a new romance author, it doesn't make sense for us to share, since we're not really qualified to judge. Ultimately, my list is my own, and those are my choices.</p>
<p><em>3. Do I always revise before offering or revise after offering?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">There is no "always." Sometimes I see potential but not enough to use up more hours. Sometimes I know the work isn't that much, so I should grab it. I go with my gut on this one. No hard-fast rules.</p>
<p><strong>YOUR END</strong></p>
<p><em>1. Can you query more agents if you have an offer on the table?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Well, this is a funny one. Suppose you're only part-way through querying and you start to get responses faster than you thought. But you still wanted to query a few more agents that you like. Can you rush a query out to them? The short answer is: sure. It's a free country. I've advocated before for letting even the agents who only have a query know that you have an offer--more options are always good.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">But you have to do it understanding that those agents might not get to it in time. If I take 2 weeks to read, then I might not see that email until you've already made a decision. </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Now, agents sometimes do this with editors. We start to get interest, so we submit more widely to create MORE interest. But I have relationships with those editors. I can call and say, "Hey, can you read this quickly? It's going fast." Because you don't have a relationship with those agents, you can't exactly say that.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">And you also have a problem of not wanting the offering agent to wait too long. But...if you think you stand a chance at getting more interest, do whatever you want as long as you understand the risks.</p>
<p><em>2. How do you go about talking to an agent's clients?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">This is easy. You ask the agent who is offering if you can speak to his/her clients. They will likely say yes, and if they don't, then that's sketchy. In this situation, I will consider which client of mine would be the most helpful to speak to, based on what they write and their overall situation. (Every case is different after all.) Then I'd put you guys in touch. </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">What you shouldn't ever do is go behind the agent's back and get in touch with clients without asking first. Those clients have their loyalty to me first, so they'd say "Uh, is this person legit?" And you also look like a creepy if you're looking for contact info through back channels. </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It's a different story if you already have a relationship with an agent's clients already. In that case, it's a little more fluid, and hopefully the agent knows about the relationship up front. And what would be ideal here is if it's been a referral situation. The client actually puts you guys in touch, which greases the wheels a little. </p>
<p><em>3. How long can you ask for to notify everyone and think about the offer?</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I think about a week is good. On the receiving end, if someone emails me saying they have an offer, I need at least a few days to read, think, and set up a phone call as well. It helps if there's a weekend in there too. Hopefully the offering agent is understanding, and if they're a jerk about it, well that's really telling information. But common courtesy is still the best thing you can set your career on, so stick to your guns on that and don't be bullied.</p>
<p> </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The Speed of Things</title><category term="CJLA Author"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="Kiera Cass"/><category term="The Selection"/><category term="industry"/><category term="queries"/><category term="timelines"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/23/the-speed-of-things.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/23/the-speed-of-things.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-06-23T11:45:39Z</published><updated>2010-06-23T11:45:39Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Some months ago, when we debated about authors notifying agents of another offer of representation, some comments were made about the speed of things when there's real interest. That if an agent doesn't respond immediately, read immediately, and offer immediately, they must not really be that interested.</p>
<p>The same argument has been made with agents sending projects out on submission. The really big deals, with large offers of money, all happen overnight. Those editors who manage to pull big pre-empts together over weekends...those are the exciting stories you guys all love, because you think that's how it needs to happen for a project to get buzz.</p>
<p>Well, guess what? That's all crap.</p>
<p>We announced some great news yesterday for one of my clients, <a href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/kiera-cass/">Kiera Cass</a>, who just had her <a href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/news/">ENTIRE TRILOGY</a> picked up by HarperCollins, in quite a nice deal. (Read: not a small potatoes one.) Before you get any farther, watch Kiera's celebratory video announcement. It's awesome. Then keep reading below.</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nn6kv2YOi60&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nn6kv2YOi60&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>Yesterday I got to thinking about Kiera's process, both in getting signed by me, and then landing this amazing deal. So I looked back at her timeline.</p>
<p>Kiera queried me on February 8th. Since I read on schedule and in order, I read her query on February 26th, and requested her manuscript. I didn't get to it immediately, but when I did I read it quickly. Then I thought about it for a few days. I then passed to Caren for a second read on March 18th. She loved it too. I emailed Kiera and asked to set up a phone call on March 22nd, wherein I offered representation. (That was my birthday, actually.) Kiera had another agent interested, but picked me a few days later. (Yay!)</p>
<p>So that was a full 6 weeks minimum from query to offer. We then revised for a month. And I sent the project out in early May. We settled a deal in mid-June, after the standard few weeks of editors reading, BEA happening right in the middle, my bugging people, editors getting me great feedback, taking things to committee, etc.</p>
<p>None of this happened overnight, and yet...an amazing project was just bought by an editor who is ecstatic about it. No one is less than enthused. And the offer didn't disappoint.</p>
<p>What's the lesson? Contrary to popular belief, speed isn't everything. Things can happen right on schedule, according to the usual timelines, and still have wonderfully happy endings. There's a reason I say how long things take for me to read. I need that time. Editors need their time too. There's a lot of backstage activity that needs to happen.</p>
<p>So next time someone tells you that an agent is only interested if they get back to you quickly, or if an editor doesn't offer immediately, tell them they're an idiot.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>May Query Stats</title><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="queries"/><category term="stats"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/18/may-query-stats.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/18/may-query-stats.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-06-18T11:49:37Z</published><updated>2010-06-18T11:49:37Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Another month, another stat blog post. I'm clearly a little farther behind schedule than I'd like to be also. But most notable in May was the drop in volume. It looks like it's perked back up now in mid-June, but...May is a mystery. Here are the full stats:</p>
<ul>
<li>Total: 261</li>
<li>Requested: 9</li>
<li>Categories of Requested: &nbsp;2 picture books,&nbsp;1 middle-grade fantasy, 2 contemporary YA, 1 paranormal YA, 1 dystopian YA, 1 YA fantasy, 1 adult non-fiction</li>
<li>Queries with attachments: 10</li>
</ul>
<p>So compared to last month, I got about 100 fewer queries. That's a big drop. Where did people go? I will say that there are 166 queries in the queue for June so far, so I should be back up to the 300+ level for this month. Yay.</p>
<p>Still, my request rate was up again. So qualitatively, things seemed better. And I had a few referrals of manuscripts that I requested as well, which don't really count as slush pile submissions.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I don't think there was anything truly notable worth mentioning. The usual array of misspellings, calling me the wrong name, derivative books...</p>
<p>If you have questions, definitely let me know.&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
</ul>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Poll: Whose Responsibility Is It?</title><category term="CJLA Info: How to Submit"/><category term="Elana Roth"/><category term="etiquette"/><category term="responsibility"/><category term="submissions info"/><id>http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/8/poll-whose-responsibility-is-it.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/6/8/poll-whose-responsibility-is-it.html"/><author><name>Elana Roth</name></author><published>2010-06-08T16:59:10Z</published><updated>2010-06-08T16:59:10Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, a lot of you guys yelled at me for switching things up on you by <a href="http://www.johnsonliterary.com/blog/2010/3/16/query-kerfuffles.html" target="_blank">saying that I wanted to be notified of an offer even if you'd only queried me</a>. The rational (I believe) for why so many people were pissed at me was that so many agents want things different ways, and how on earth can you be expected to get it straight? (I still think that's lame, by the way.)</p>
<p>Well, today I was contemplating adding another form rejection (I have a few I use for different reasons) that would be sent to all queriers who seemed to have missed the boat on how to submit to us properly to begin with. But I am hedging on this one. Mostly because I'm not sure it's my job to do your work for you.</p>
<p>I think I'm part of a group of agents who goes ABOVE AND BEYOND the call of duty in terms of educating the writer community. We blog, we Twitter...we go to conferences galore. But is this good will or genuine responsibility? I think it's a little from Column A, a little from Column B, personally. More from Column A though.</p>
<p>So I am going to ask YOU, my faithful readers, and hopefully some not-so-faithful readers who like having opinions to answer the following questions:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li>Whose responsibility is it to make sure you submit properly? Mine or yours?</li>
<li>Where does my responsibility end?&nbsp;</li>
<li>And more specifically: should I bother with an extra form rejection for Those Who Do Not Seem To Get It?</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry></feed>