Connect
Search

Thoughts on Books, Writing, and the Industry

 

Click to Browse the Blog Archive

Entries in submissions (8)

Wednesday
Sep012010

Submissions Update - Again

Hey literary world. So my August closure to queries was helpful, but I'm still behind. I haven't quite cleared out what was there from July (working on it). The bigger thing is that I have a lot of work to do for existing clients. 

I'm sure you would agree if you were in their shoes that an agent's first responsibility is to her clients, not her query pool. What good would I be if I just kept signing new things instead of selling the things I have, right?

So for another month, that's what I'll be concentrating on. I will reopen eventually, but for the meantime, you'll get a nice auto-response from me if you query me. Mostly they will be deleted unread. The one exception is if I've asked to see your next book before this point, please do email me anyway if you're ready to query. 

Thanks!

Tuesday
Jun012010

Ebbs and Flows

So I almost hate to say this, even though I just tweeted it, but my volume of queries has been down significantly so far in May. I'm noticing this more because of the March and April Query Stats posts--I've been gathering up the May submissions as well. My numbers just don't compare to April. 

When these things happen I actually get a little paranoid. Where are the projects going? Are people choosing not to query me? Are my agent colleagues elsewhere seeing things that I want to see also? Did I do something wrong? Is my name not getting out enough places?

Or is it something else? Something in the water? Some subliminal psychological undercurrents? Something in the annual life-cycle of the writer species?

Someone suggested that maybe all the NaNoWriMo novels dried up. Or maybe there's a misconception that publishing slows down in the summer, so people we're rushing their projects out the door for quick sales. (Which is a silly way to approach this anyway.)

But you tell me: do you think there's any logic to why some months are heavier than others?

And while I'm at it...send me stuff! Good stuff. You know what I'm talking about. Right?

Friday
May142010

April Query Stats

I promised. So here we go...

  • Total: 351
  • Requested: 8
  • Categories of Requested: 3 MG, 3 contemporary YA, 1 YA fantasy, 1 narrative nonfiction 
  • Queries with attachments: 15
  • People who wrote thank you notes: 18

So compared to last month, I saw a 22% increase in queries. My request rate also went up a little. But...it's still only just shy of 3%. (Isn't that scary?) And again, there were some spam queries that all the agents I know, and some I don't, were CCed on. I delete those right away, mark as spam, and don't count them. 

My thoughts...

Style

There were a few notable events in the query pile this month that show me how little people must research ahead of time. There was one email in a pink font on a flowery pink background. My eyes hurt just opening it, and I didn't even care what the content was. Had it been on paper, I'd have expected glitter and perfume. There were also several letters that barely qualified as letters. Either incredibly casual, like "Hey there, can I send you something?" or just reeking of "I don't know what I'm doing." Those are hard to deal with, but by and large I try to find what the book is somewhere (if it's there) and send a rejection.

There's also still that weird syndrome of a lack of sample pages. I really think every listing of mine says: please include the first 3-5 pages of the manuscript in the body of the email. If it doesn't somewhere, can someone let me know? 

I included the number of thank you notes I got for my form rejection letter. It's nice when people are polite. It's less nice when they also ask me if I can recommend another agent. I don't write back to these.

But at least compared the number of people who are still sending me attachments, there are more polite people than sloppy people. The number of unsolicited attachments I got DOUBLED this month. Probably a fluke, but it goes to the point that a solid 10% of people just aren't paying attention AT ALL. And many more just plain don't get it in the first place.

 

Requests

I seem to be on a middle-grade kick, which is good. I'm looking for good middle-grade, so my requests fit that bill. The concepts on each of these seemed promising, hence the requests.

Obviously the narrative nonfiction was an exception, since I so rarely do those books, but I loved the writing. 

As for the YA, the contemporary YA seemed to be stronger this month in terms of writing and premise. I may also be burned out of dystopian and fantasy. Bear in mind, I already represent 3 authors who have published or about-to-be published dystopian novels. As much as I love them, I'm going to be picky. I don't want to be a one trick pony.

And that's April! Time to dig into May...and I enjoy this now, so stay tuned for the next installment next month.

Tuesday
Apr132010

March Query Stats

I promised a few weeks ago that I'd do an experiment. So instead of deleting after responding, I moved every March query and its accompanying response from me into a new folder, so I could do some analysis. Here we go:

  • TOTAL: 286
  • REQUESTED: 3
  • CATEGORY OF REQUESTED: 2 YA, 1 MG
  • QUERIES WITH ATTACHMENTS: 7
  • CATEGORIES I DON'T REP: 24

 

Other items of note: 

Numbers:

The actual number of emails I received was a bit higher than 286. That number does not include anyone who emailed me a second time (almost immediately) with a correction to their prior query. I would guess there were a good 10 of those. And then there were a few cases where the querier CCed the entire industry on the email. I don't respond to those and they get deleted.

I should add also that while my request rate is always low, this month was very low. This is because I happened to sign 2 amazing new projects right in the middle of the month as I was beginning to read the March 1st queries. So as the ebb and flow goes, I was going to need to be really wowed to want to see something.

Genres:

If you think about how many queries were not categories I rep in relation to the total number received, that's about 10%. 10%! The bulk of them were for memoirs. I don't really do those. The remainder were largely for some non-specific type of adult fiction. And a minority were still for...vampires! Is there a listing for me anywhere that doesn't say "No vampires"? If there is, please let me know. 

Addressing problems:

  • ADDRESSED TO "Dear Agent": 3 
  • ADDRESSED TO "Ms. Johnson": 3
  • ADDRESSED TO "Elana Johnson": 2
  • SPELLED MY NAME "ELENA": 9

We're a small agency, peeps. There are 2 of us that work here. And only one of us is even open to submissions right now. That would be me. So these 17 queries that just didn't even know who I am are kind of annoying. And look how the misspelling of my name trumps the letter being addressed to someone other than me. Please read carefully. Double-check spellings of names. For your own sake. You look sloppy otherwise.

Miscellany:

This was the first month I got a query sent from an iPhone. Yep, "Sent from my iPhone" signature at all. And it was one of the categories I don't rep. So that person's tactics probably need some re-evaluation.

I also got a decent number of thank you notes and/or people asking me who else I'd recommend they query. Needless to say, I don't reply to those either. A rejection isn't an invitation to conversation, unless I indicate as much. You're responsible for your own research. I'm not doing it for you.

And then of course is the ever-rising syndrome of "just plain unprofessional" letters, that show me people are querying somewhat casually. Several other agents have commented on this on their blogs this week, so I'll just reiterate their points. Whether it's just that the internet blew the lid off the filters, or that people are lazy, it is definitely too easy to send off those letters. Whoever I'm railing against probably isn't reading this post, but at least I can hope that those of you who are will be better prepared.

Should I do it again for April? I think I might. I'd like to see if there's a rise or fall in any of the numbers.

Tuesday
Mar162010

Query Kerfuffles

So today, after a little incident in my query pile, I posted something to Twitter that started a bit of a kerfuffle. That tweet was: 

@elanaroth: You know, I'm quick on query turnaround. Requested one sent on 2/23. Author already got an agent. Am I wrong to have wanted notice of offer?

With all apologies due the writer who sparked this reaction from me (seriously, it's not just you, I'm sorry!), this kind of thing happens sometimes. I'm going through my query pile, see something I'm interested in, ask for it, and get a note back, "Sorry! I've already gotten representation."

My reaction today had a few parts. First: well, shucks. Second: How did that happen in the 2 weeks since the query came in? And third: why didn't you tell me you got an offer?

Now, I know the standard operating procedure is to notify only the agents who have partials or fulls that you got an offer. And I fully support that. There's nothing more irritating than reading something, thinking about it, and then having someone not give you the courtesy of a response before accepting another offer. Like, why did you bother?

My reasoning for supporting that rule is thusly: this is your career. If other people are considering your work, and some of them are really digging it, don't you want to be able to make the best decision? The first offer is not always the best one. 

But I guess the specific question today is, do you notify the people who only have your query letter that you've received an offer? 

Truthfully, it could go either way. I'd like to think that if you queried me at all, you are interested in my representing you. So a query that is no longer viable just says to me, "Psych! I wasn't really serious about that." Is that what you're going for? Or did you really want to see what I thought? Pulling it from me without telling me tells me I'm irrelevant. And it wastes my time when I do get to your letter.

And if anything, contacting those query-only agents will help you. One Twitterer said this actually prompted more offers on her book. How awesome is that? You're saying no for them by not giving them the heads-up. And the worst they could say if you did? No. What's to lose? Nothing.

That said, I do understand the rationale behind only contacting the people who have requested material. Those people have already expressed interest. There are also a lot of non-responder agents out there. So there's no way to know if you've already been passed over and you're just adding clutter to the inbox.

But for me, the moral of the story is I don't think there's ever any harm in being a good communicator, which in this case involves tying up loose ends. And since it's your career, I'd hope you make those kinds of communication decisions--and representation decisions--wisely. There's so much conflicting information out there (I probably just added to it) but common sense and courtesy go a long way. 

Yell at me below...

~Elana